Legal Opinion
York v. Day Transfer Co.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided November 20, 2007No. C.A. 04-551SPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WILLIAM E. SMITH, District Judge.
Defendant Day Transfer Company (“Day”) and Third-Party Defendant Williams Moving Company (“Williams”) move jointly for summary judgment on all claims against them based on their interpretation of the so-called Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 14706(a)(1), and request entry of final judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b). Defendant Andrews Express & Storage Warehouse, Inc. (“Andrews”) moves for summary judgment independently, but under the same theory of preemption. Plaintiffs Jason and Maureen York (the Works”) oppose both motions. After…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ameriswiss Technology, LLC v. Midway Line of Illinois, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
- Boyle v. Barnstable Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Continental Motors, Inc. v. Jewell Aircraft, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2012
- Freight Tec Management v. ChemexCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Godfrey v. Nationwide Vinyl Siding & Home Improvement, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.