Legal Opinion

State v. Gonzalez

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2000No. 990257PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Eduardo Miguel Gonzalez appeals from a criminal judgment and commitment finding him guilty of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. Because the district court erred in denying Gonzalez’s N.D.R.Crim.P. 29 motion for judgment of acquittal, we reverse his conviction.

I

[¶ 2] An informant for the North Dakota Bureau of Criminal Investigation telephoned Gonzalez three or four times, attempting to set up a drug transaction. The informant testified Gonzalez agreed to meet him to sell him an “eight ball,” or one-eighth ounce of cocaine. According to Gonzalez, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AllenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. Holy BullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. FreedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. HafnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. RomeroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. WeaverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. EgglestonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. BrossartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. AzureNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API