State v. Gonzalez
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Eduardo Miguel Gonzalez appeals from a criminal judgment and commitment finding him guilty of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. Because the district court erred in denying Gonzalez’s N.D.R.Crim.P. 29 motion for judgment of acquittal, we reverse his conviction.
I
[¶ 2] An informant for the North Dakota Bureau of Criminal Investigation telephoned Gonzalez three or four times, attempting to set up a drug transaction. The informant testified Gonzalez agreed to meet him to sell him an “eight ball,” or one-eighth ounce of cocaine. According to Gonzalez, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. AllenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. Holy BullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. FreedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HafnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. RomeroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. WeaverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. EgglestonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. BrossartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. AzureNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.