Legal Opinion
State v. Freed
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 22, 1999No. 980344PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Mary Beth Freed appealed jury verdicts and a judgment finding her guilty of delivery of a controlled substance and conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. We affirm.
[¶ 2] As a result of methamphetamine transactions in Dickinson on October 14 and 15, 1997, Freed was charged with delivering a controlled substance, methamphetamine, and conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. The amended information alleged:
Count 1: That on or about October 15, 1997, at Dickinson, in Stark County, North Dakota, the Defendant Mary Beth Freed, willfully delivered a controlled…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Carol Kozinski, Ilmi Fejzoski, James Havelka, Jeanette Martinez, James Brennan, James Abney, Mark Morgan, and Peter DemopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- State v. TriebNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PurdyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. OsierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. EntziNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. DemaraisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Piatz v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KrullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.