Legal Opinion

State v. Azure

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2017No. 20160402PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VandeWalle, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Duane Azure, Jr., appealed a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of aggravated assault. Azure argues the district court abused its discretion by allowing two prior statements of the State’s witness into evidence at trial. Because the district court abused its discretion in allowing the victim’s prior statement to Agent Kluth into evidence under North Dakota Rules of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B), we reverse and remand.

I

[II2] On April 20, 2014, a deputy was sent to Duane Azure, Sr.’s residence after law enforcement received numerous calls from the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. CollicottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. State v. KringstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. United States v. Joseph PivaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Refugio RuizCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Interest of SkorickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. WattsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  4. State v. HendersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State v. SanchezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API