Legal Opinion

Schulz v. General Casualty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1939PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The foregoing states the material facts and the general issues. The claims of the appellants may be briefly stated as follows : They contend that the judgment below should be reversed and dismissal of the complaint should be directed because, (1) Lund, the driver of the truck, as matter of law, was not guilty of any negligence under the undisputed evidence, and that if he was guilty of causal negligence, (2) the causal negligence of Schulz, the deceased driver of the Ford, as matter of law, was at least equal to that of Lund. They also claim that if not entitled to dismissal of the action,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pollard v. TobinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Zurn v. WhatleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Cameron v. Union Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Potter v. PotterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Streeter v. HumrichouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Chang v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Brook v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Thiel v. DamrauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Millonig v. BakkenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API