Legal Opinion

Cont'nal Natl. Bk. of Ft. Worth v. Conner

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1948No. A-1712PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garwood

Continental National Bank of Fort Worth, petitioner here, sued respondents, H. M. Conner and wife, to enforce for the amount of $1,400.00 and interest a mechanic’s lien note of $4,250.00, made by the Conners and hypothecated to the bank by the payee of the note, A. D. Womack, who was also the contractor in the mechanic’s lien contract; the pledge being security for a loan or loans to Womack by the bank in the principal sum of $1,400.00. The premises in question were not a homestead at the time of the execution or hypothecation of the note and contract. The administrator of Womack’s estate and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cochran v. Wool Growers Central Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Pope v. BeauchampTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Enoch v. BrandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. West v. First Bap. Ch. of TaftTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Page v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1913

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Ogden v. Dickinson State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Davidson v. ClearmanTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Wilhite v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Bryan v. Citizens National Bank in AbileneTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. FFP Marketing Co. v. Long Lane Master Trust IVCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API