Legal Opinion

Rossi Fine Jewelers, Inc. v. Gunderson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this appeal, we decide whether a contract clause requires compulsory arbitration. The trial court ruled that federal law mandates arbitration. We affirm.

Background

[¶ 2.] Defendant Nature’s 10, Inc., was incorporated in South Dakota in 1995. In 1996, defendant Mylan Ventures, Ltd., a Wyoming corporation, purchased Nature’s 10. The remaining defendants, Mike Alva-no, Frank Barnes, Kirk Gardner, Brian Gunderson, Jerry Haack, Barney Schu-macher, and Randy Slaybaugh, were either directors or officers of Nature’s 10 or Mylan during the time of the transactions described…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pennzoil Company v. Arnold Oil Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  4. Hirschfeld Productions, Inc. v. MirvishNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Thunderstik Lodge, Inc. v. ReuerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Donald White v. Sunoco IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. Nature's 10 Jewelers v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Wright v. GGNSC Holdings LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Flandreau Public School District 50-3 v. G.A. Johnson Construction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Giddings v. Media Lodge, Inc.United States District Court · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API