Rossi Fine Jewelers, Inc. v. Gunderson
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this appeal, we decide whether a contract clause requires compulsory arbitration. The trial court ruled that federal law mandates arbitration. We affirm.
Background
[¶ 2.] Defendant Nature’s 10, Inc., was incorporated in South Dakota in 1995. In 1996, defendant Mylan Ventures, Ltd., a Wyoming corporation, purchased Nature’s 10. The remaining defendants, Mike Alva-no, Frank Barnes, Kirk Gardner, Brian Gunderson, Jerry Haack, Barney Schu-macher, and Randy Slaybaugh, were either directors or officers of Nature’s 10 or Mylan during the time of the transactions described…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennzoil Company v. Arnold Oil Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- Hirschfeld Productions, Inc. v. MirvishNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Thunderstik Lodge, Inc. v. ReuerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Donald White v. Sunoco IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Nature's 10 Jewelers v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Wright v. GGNSC Holdings LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Flandreau Public School District 50-3 v. G.A. Johnson Construction, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Giddings v. Media Lodge, Inc.United States District Court · 2018
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.