Legal Opinion

Southland Corp. v. Keating

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 23, 1984No. 82-500PublishedCited by 1,761 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger

This case presents the questions (a) whether the California Franchise Investment Law, which invalidates certain arbitration agreements covered by the Federal Arbitration Act, violates the Supremacy Clause and (b) whether arbitration under the federal Act is impaired when a class-action structure is imposed on the process by the state courts.

r*H

Appellant Southland Corp. is the owner and franchisor of 7-Eleven convenience stores. Southland’s standard franchise agreement provides each franchisee with a license to use certain registered trademarks, a lease or sublease of a convenience store owned…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,761 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

1,756 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API