Pennzoil Company v. Arnold Oil Company
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
*497OPINION
Opinion by:
SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice.
In these consolidated proceedings, Pennzoil Company and Pennzoil Products Company complain of the trial court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration of Arnold Oil Company’s claims against them. We dismiss Pennzoil’s interlocutory appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the arbitration clause at issue is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act, and we conditionally grant the requested writ of mandamus.
Factual and Procedural Background
Pennzoil and Arnold entered into a nonexclusive contract for Arnold to distribute Pennzoil oils and lubricants…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Prudential Securities Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- EZ Pawn Corp. v. ManciasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- In Re D. Wilson Const. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Vesta Insurance Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Williams Industries, Inc. v. Earth Development Systems Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- AutoNation USA Corp. v. Leroy, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.