Legal Opinion
Wright v. GGNSC Holdings LLC
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 2011No. 25953PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] The parties’ arbitration agreement provided that arbitration would occur “in accordance with the National Arbitration Forum Code of Procedure,” but the National Arbitration Forum (NAF) became unavailable to administer its Code and the arbitration. Defendants-Appellants (collectively “GGNSC”) moved the circuit court to appoint a substitute arbitrator under Section 5 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The circuit court concluded that a substitute arbitrator could not be appointed under Section 5 because the NAF Code of Procedure was integral to the parties’ agreement…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Great Earth Companies, Inc., and Great Earth International Franchising Corp. v. Richard Simons and Kimberly SimonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Kpmg LLP v. CocchiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wert v. ManorCare of Carlisle PA, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Miller v. GGNSC Atlanta, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Dean v. Heritage Healthcare of Ridgeway, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Meskill v. GGNSC Stillwater Greeley LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Riley v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.