Legal Opinion
Hirschfeld Productions, Inc. v. Mirvish
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 22, 1996PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Defendants David and Edwin Mirvish are the president and chairman, respectively, of Mirvish Productions (MP), a Canadian theatrical production company. They also own the Old Vic Theater in London, England, through an entity called Ed Mirvish Enterprises Limited ("Enterprises”). In April 1993, plaintiff Hirschfeld Productions, Inc. (HPI) and MP entered into a joint venture agreement to produce the theatrical production "Hair” at the Old Vic Theater. The agreement was signed by David Mirvish on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCarthy v. AzureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Fletcher v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by39 opinions
- Grand Wireless, Inc. v. Verizon Wireless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. v. KvaernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Price v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Mionis v. Bank Julius Baer & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Rossi Fine Jewelers, Inc. v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.