Legal Opinion

Robert R. York, Cross-Appellants v. City of Wichita Falls, Texas, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 11, 1991No. 90-1817PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Chief Judge:

I

The City of Wichita Falls (City) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on their claim that the City violated § 8 of the 1985 amendments to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 29 U.S.C. § 215 (Supp.1989) (Historical and Statutory Notes). The plaintiffs cross-appeal the district court’s determination of damages. Summary judgment was improper. The judgment appealed from is vacated and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

II

On February 19, 1985, the Supreme Court in Garcia v. San Antonio Metro Transit Authority, 469 U.S.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Abshire v. County of KernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Dana Blackie v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Hagan v. Echostar Satellite, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Anthony Piscione v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Smidt v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. Lott v. Howard Wilson Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API