Dana Blackie v. State of Maine
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, several probation officers employed by the State of Maine seek to evade the consequences of what they belatedly deem to be a Faustian bargain. The district court thought the probation officers’ claim took too much license, and rejected it. See Blackie v. Maine, 888 F.Supp. 203 (D.Me.1995). The plaintiffs appeal. 1 We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
The subsidiary facts are not in serious dispute. Beginning in 1978, collective bargaining agreements between the State of Maine and certain state workers stipulated that those employees whose positions demanded that they…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by366 opinions
- Vincent DeNOVELLIS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Smith v. F.W. Morse Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Daniel J. Roche Et Ux. Valerie Roche v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Marrero v. Goya of Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Cochran v. Quest Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
361 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.