Legal Opinion
Anthony Piscione v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 23, 1999No. 98-1923PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Anthony Piscione appeals the district court’s decision granting the motion for summary judgment made by Ernst & Young, L.L.P. (“Ernst & Young”), his former employer. Piscione sued Ernst & Young under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) for failure to provide him with overtime pay. He argues that the district court erred in granting summary judgment because it failed to consider evidence he believes demonstrates that he does not fit within one of the statutory exemptions relieving employers from their statutory duty to pay overtime to then-salary basis employees. Upon…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Anthony Hill v. Daniel M. TangherliniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Anthony D. Buie v. Quad/graphics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Ahmmad Pourghoraishi v. Flying J, Incorporated, Steve Lindgren, Larry Williams, City of Gary, Indiana, Nakon Security, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Thomas Amadio v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Richard Thorn and Pat Curran v. Sundstrand Aerospace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.