Legal Opinion

Bellman v. County of Contra Costa

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1960No. S. F. 20398PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

In this action in inverse condemnation based on earth slippages plaintiff 1 appeals from a judgment of dismissal after the granting of a motion “for a nonsuit for the insufficiency of plaintiffs’ proof.” Prom a memorandum opinion it appears that the motion was granted on the theory that the claim filed by plaintiff with defendant county was not timely under the one-year claim provisions of sections 29702 and 29704 of the Government Code as they read at the times involved. We have concluded that the trial court was correct as to slippages which occurred more than one year prior to the filing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. California Employment Stabilization Commission v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Keys v. RomleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Leaf v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API