California Employment Stabilization Commission v. Payne
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
In January, 1944, plaintiff commission sued defendant for unemployment contributions claimed to be due for the year 1937 and part of the year 1938. The trial court concluded that the action was barred by subdivision 1 of section 338 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that, for certain reasons which need not be noted here, the plaintiff was estopped from collecting the tax. Judgment was accordingly rendered for defendant, and the commission has appealed from this judgment.
Defendant, who owned and operated a beauty shop, paid no contributions under the Unemployment Insurance Act [Stats. 1935,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Rosefield Packing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Stockton Savings & Loan Bank v. MassanetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- McClung v. Employment Development DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.