In Re Servaas
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) recommended that this Court remove 63rd District Court Judge Steven Servaas (respondent) from office for vacating his judicial office, as well as for judicial misconduct involving a comment and two drawings of a sexual nature. Because we conclude that the only appropriate forum to determine whether respondent vacated his judicial office is a quo warranto action filed by the Attorney General in the Court of Appeals, we reject the JTC’s recommendation as to the vacation of office claim. Respondent’s conduct concerning the comment and two drawings was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gildemeister v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- In Re LoydMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re ChrzanowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Frey v. MichieMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- People ex rel. Metevier v. TherrienMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. DowdyMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Davis v. ChatmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re HalloranMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Attorney General v. ClarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.