Legal Opinion

People v. Dowdy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2011No. Docket 140603PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, C.J.

We granted leave to appeal in this case to determine whether homeless sex offenders are obligated to comply with the registration requirement imposed by the Sex Offenders Registration Act (SORA).1 Specifically, we consider whether homeless sex offenders have a “residence” or “domicile” such that they can comply with the statute’s registration requirements. We hold that homelessness is not a bar to compliance with SORA because homelessness does not preclude an offender from entering a police station and reporting to a law enforcement agency regarding the offender’s residence or domicile. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. FranciscoMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. City of Taylor v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Drouillard v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Henry v. HenryMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. BassMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People v. MarchMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. WilgusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Does v. SnyderDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API