Legal Opinion
Gildemeister v. Lindsay
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 77PublishedCited by 36 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Dingeman (Harry J.), J. Bill by Charles B. Gildemeister against Richard Lindsay and others, composing the city election commission of the city of Detroit, to enjoin the certification of certain election returns. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
At the election held in the city of Detroit on April 5, 1920, Act No. 369 of the Public Acts *301of Michigan for 1919 was approved by the electors of the city. The act is entitled as follows:
“An act to supplement existing laws providing for the establishment and maintenance of municipal courts of record, and defining the jurisdiction of such courts; to fix the number of judges thereof; to provide a presiding judge; to define the privileges of such presiding judge; to modify the procedure in and extend the jurisdiction of said courts in certain respects, and to provide for the abolishing of any…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Board of Auditors v. BenoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- People v. MaynardMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Brown v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
- Burt v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- People v. TownsendMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- People v. RichmondMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- East Grand Rapids School District v. Kent County Tax Allocation BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- T.M. v. M.Z.Michigan Supreme Court · 2018
- In Re ServaasMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.