Legal Opinion

Gartner v. Temple

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2014No. 26950PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Appellant, Merle Temple (“Temple”), appeals the Sixth Judicial Circuit Court’s judgment ordering the partition in kind of 3,374.9 acres of land located in Jackson County, South Dakota, owned with Appellee, Bradley Gartner, as tenants in common. Temple argues that the property cannot be partitioned without causing great prejudice, that the circuit court undervalued permanent structures on the land, and that the court should have reduced the amount of the ordered compensatory payment in favor of allocating additional land to Temple. We affirm.

Facts and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Arneson v. ArnesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. F. M. Slagle & Co. v. BushnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Schnell v. SchnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Novak v. NovakSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Osman v. Karlen and AssociatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. BirdsheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Dowling Family Partnership v. Midland Farms, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. MacKaben v. MacKabenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Knecht v. EvridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API