Legal Opinion

State v. Crelly

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1981No. 13396PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

Pursuant to a bench trial, appellant William J. Crelly was found guilty of making an unlawful obscene and lewd telephone call in violation of SDCL 49-31-31(1). Appellant alleges that SDCL 49-31-31(1) is unconstitutional and, in the alternative, that the facts herein do not indicate a violation of said statute. We affirm.

I

The statute under scrutiny, SDCL 49-31-31(1), provides:

It shall be unlawful for any person to use a telephone for any of the following purposes:(1) To call another person with intent to terrorize, intimidate, threaten, harass, or annoy such person by using…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. Bad Heart BullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. HavensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Alobaidi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. State v. JaegerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. Big HeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. KipfNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. BakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. HaugeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. GattisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API