State v. Crelly
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
Pursuant to a bench trial, appellant William J. Crelly was found guilty of making an unlawful obscene and lewd telephone call in violation of SDCL 49-31-31(1). Appellant alleges that SDCL 49-31-31(1) is unconstitutional and, in the alternative, that the facts herein do not indicate a violation of said statute. We affirm.
I
The statute under scrutiny, SDCL 49-31-31(1), provides:
It shall be unlawful for any person to use a telephone for any of the following purposes:(1) To call another person with intent to terrorize, intimidate, threaten, harass, or annoy such person by using…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. Bad Heart BullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. HavensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Alobaidi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- State v. JaegerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. Big HeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. KipfNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. HaugeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. GattisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.