Legal Opinion

Frohwerk v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 10, 1919No. 685PublishedCited by 297 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is an indictment in thirteen counts. The first alleges a conspiracy between the plaintiff in error and one Carl Gleeser, they then being engaged in the preparation and publication of a newspaper, the Missouri Staats Zeitung, to violate the Espionage Act of June 15, 1917, c. 30, § 3, 40 Stat. 217, 219. It alleges as overt acts the preparation and circulation of twelve articles, &c. in the said newspaper at different dates from July 6, 1917, to December 7 of the same year. The other counts allege attempts to cause disloyalty, mutiny and refusal of duty in the . military and naval forces of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robertson v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Joplin Mercantile Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Buckeye Powder Co. v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

3Cited by297 opinions

  1. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Abrams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

292 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API