Legal Opinion
CAPITAL TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. v. Arias & Arias Consultores
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided December 22, 2008No. 05-07-00280-CVPublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Chief Justice THOMAS.
Arias & Arias Consultores and Pegasus Brokerage House, Inc. sued Capital Technology Information Services, Inc., Raj N. Shah, and others who are not parties to this appeal for unjust enrichment, conversion, conspiracy, and other causes of action. After the trial court denied the special appearances filed by CTIS and Shah, they filed this interlocutory appeal.
CTIS and Shah argue the trial court erred because: (1) Arias and Pegasus failed to plead specific jurisdictional facts; (2) CTIS and Shah met their burden to negate the jurisdictional facts pleaded;…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- RSR Corp. v. Siegmund, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- Bob Montgomery Chevrolet, Inc. v. Dent Zone Companies, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Ruiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Assurances Générales Banque Nationale v. Dhalla, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- Parex Resources, Inc. and Ramshorn International Limited v. ERG Resources, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.