Legal Opinion

RSR Corp. v. Siegmund

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 26, 2010No. 05-09-00571-CVPublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice MURPHY.

In this suit involving allegations of misuse of confidential information, appellants RSR Corporation and Quemetco Metals Limited, Inc. appeal the trial court’s orders granting (1) the special appearances of appellees Inppamet S.A. a/k/a Inppamet Ltda. (Inppamet) and Plastic and Metal Parts, Inc. (PlaMetCo) and (2) the motions to dismiss of Inppamet and PlaMetCo, joined by appellee Andreas Siegmund, based on both a forum-selection clause and the doctrine of forum non conveniens. We reverse the trial court’s two orders and remand this case for further proceedings.

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Ina Collins v. Mary Kay IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. in Re Mark Fisher and Reece BoudreauxTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Ruiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  4. Masterguard, L.P. v. Eco Technologies International LLC D/B/A Yellowblue, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  5. Vinmar Trade Finance, Ltd. v. Utility Trailers De Mexico, S.A. De C.V., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API