Legal Opinion
Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Ruiz
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided August 25, 2011No. 01-10-00516-CVPublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice.
Appellee John Cronan filed a motion for rehearing of our April 14, 2011 opinion. We grant rehearing, withdraw our April 14, 2011 opinion and judgment and issue this opinion and judgment in their place. The disposition of the case remains unchanged.
In this interlocutory appeal, appellants, Waterman Steamship Corporation (“Waterman”) and Maersk Line, Limited (“Maersk”), appeal the trial court’s order denying their special appearances. Appel-lees, Miguel Ruiz, John Cronan, and Richard Hicks, sued Waterman and Maersk for negligence under the Jones Act…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. JoachimTexas Supreme Court · 2010
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Sherman v. BostonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Dukatt v. DukattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Brenham Oil & Gas, Inc. v. TGS-NOPEC Geophysical CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Bautista v. Trinidad Drilling Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- J & J Container Manufacturing, Inc. v. Cintas-R U.S., L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.