Legal Opinion
Lum v. American Wheel & Vehicle Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1913No. S.F. No. 5720PublishedCited by 19 opinions
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco dissolving an injunction. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
This case was decided by the district court of appeal and an order of the superior court dissolving an injunction pendente lite against the sale of plaintiff’s stock for nonpayment of an assessment was upheld. This court granted a rehearing and upon a further consideration of the matter we have reached a different conclusion. However, we adopt the statement of fact from the opinion of the district court of appeal as follows:
“The defendant in this case is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Arizona. Its principal place of business is designated at Phoenix,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Relfe v. RundleSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- First National Bank v. Gustin Minerva Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- American Foundry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
- Riverside Land Co. v. JarvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Sargent v. Palace Cafe Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Whicher v. Delaware Mines Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.