Legal Opinion

Schroeter v. Bartlett Syndicate Building Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1936No. L. A. 14987PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiff as the owner of certain shares of the capital stock of defendant corporation recovered judgment for the amounts paid by him on certain assessments upon this stock. The complaint alleges and the court below found that the corporation had no authority to levy or collect these assessments. The controversy has arisen because of a change in the law conferring upon corporations the right to assess stockholders.

At the time the corporation was organized and also when the plaintiff’s stock was issued, section 331 of the Civil Code permitted the directors of a corporation to levy and collect…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Davis v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
  3. School District Number Two v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. McGowan v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Rainey v. MichelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stevenot v. NorbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Investment Company Institute v. CampDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
  3. Wilson v. Cherokee Drift Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. DeMello v. Dairyman's Cooperative CreameryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Silva v. Coastal Plywood & Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API