Legal Opinion

County of Maricopa v. Paysnoe

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1957No. 6256PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

This action originated as a proceeding in condemnation brought by Maricopa County to acquire the north 7 feet of Lots 23 and 24, East Thomas Road Tract, for the purpose of improving facilities for highway travel. Lot 23 is substantially vacant; on Lot 24 there is a building used for restaurant purposes. The trial court in its memorandum of decision prior to judgment stated that some severance damage was suffered by Lot 23 and that substantial severance damage was suffered by Lot 24. Findings of fact were thereafter approved, fixing the severance damage to these lots as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Stockton v. EllingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In Re ForsstromArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State Ex Rel. LaPrade v. CarrowArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Pima County v. De ConciniArizona Supreme Court · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Jay Six Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Rayburn v. State Ex Rel. WilleyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Burns v. HerbergerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. City of Tucson v. LaForgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. DIV. OF ADMIN., STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. JirikDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API