Legal Opinion
Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of Kentwood
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1979No. Docket Nos. 57225, 57342. (Calendar Nos. 6, 7)PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Turkish v City of Warren
This zoning case causes . us to revisit Kropf, 1 Sabo, 2 and Kirk. 3 We hold that the majority rule enunciated in both Kropf and Kirk as well as the minority opinion of Justice Williams in Sabo remain the law in Michigan today insofar as the appropriate standard for determining the validity of zoning ordinances is concerned. Accordingly, we affirm the Court of Appeals ruling of unconstitutionality, but remand this matter to the Warren City Council acting as zoning authority for further action consistent with this opinion,
I. The Appropriate Standard
The appropriate…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- MacK v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Delta Charter Twp. v. DinolfoMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Schwartz v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- MacEnas v. Village of MichianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Schwartz v. City of FlintMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.