Senefsky v. City of Huntington Woods
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal in the nature of certiorari from denial in the circuit court of Oakland county of the relief sought by mandamus. Mr. Justice BUSHNELL has written for affirmance. For the reasons herein noted I do not concur.
The facts and circumstances giving rise to this litigation fairly appear in my Brother's opinion. In his appeal plaintiff asserts that under the circumstances of this case the provision in the amended zoning ordinance which "prohibits the erection of houses having less than 1,300 square feet of usable floor area" is unreasonable. The precise issue is whether defendants'…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cady v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. Muskegon Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Moreland v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Wolverine Sign Works v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by53 opinions
- Christine Building Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Carter v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
- Long v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Northwood Properties Co. v. Royal Oak City InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Hitchman v. Township of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.