Legal Opinion

State v. Purcell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 2015No. COA14–1047PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

*223James Mark Purcell ("defendant") appeals from judgments entered on jury verdicts, in which the jury found him guilty of rape of a child, two counts of sexual offense with a child, and taking indecent liberties with a child. Defendant contends that (1) the trial court committed plain error in admitting expert opinion testimony and (2) the trial court erred in its sentencing determinations. We find no error in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I. Background

One afternoon in the summer of 2010, S.G.'s mother dropped off eleven-year-old S.G. and her siblings at S.G's grandmother's…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MumfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BarbourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API