Legal Opinion

State v. Heath

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1986No. 702A85PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The question dispositive of this appeal is whether the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor to pose a question to an expert in clinical psychology regarding whether the victim had a mental condition which would cause her to fabricate a story about the sexual assault. Concluding that it so erred, we order a new trial.

At trial the state’s evidence tended to show that on 5 February 1983 thirteen-year-old Victoria Ann Purser (Vickie), who had been living with her maternal grandparents in Grifton, was visiting her parents and siblings in Kinston. Vickie had gone to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Mark Kevin BinderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. State v. SillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. KeenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Yount v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. AgualloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API