Legal Opinion

State v. Stancil

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 2002No. 589A01PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Per curiam

In a sexual offense prosecution involving a child victim, the trial court should not admit expert opinion that sexual abuse has in fact occurred because, absent physical evidence supporting a diagnosis of sexual abuse, such testimony is an impermissible opinion regarding the victim’s credibility. State v. Trent, 320 N.C. 610, 359 S.E.2d 463 (1987); State v. Grover, 142 N.C. App. 411, 543 S.E.2d 179, aff’d per curiam, 354 N.C. 354, 553 S.E.2d 679 (2001). However, an expert witness may testify, upon a proper foundation, as to the profiles of sexually abused children and whether a particular…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. State v. AgualloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. State v. ToweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. BuchholtzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. HammettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  5. In Re ButtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API