Legal Opinion

Stegall v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 13, 1990No. 304-88 CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RADER, Judge.

This action arises from a dispute under the Agricultural Adjustment Acts of 1938 and 1949. 7 U.S.C. §§ 1281-1469 (1988). Plaintiffs are partners in two general part*767nerships that conduct farming operations in Colusa County, California. The partnerships finance their operations through a joint loan obtained from a local bank.

The county, state, and federal Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASCS) offices limited plaintiffs’ farm subsidy to $50,000.00 — the maximum payment for a single farmer. Plaintiffs believed that the $50,000.00 payment limitation would…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hanson v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Doty v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Ishida v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  4. Ross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. Simons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API