Stegall v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RADER, Judge.
This action arises from a dispute under the Agricultural Adjustment Acts of 1938 and 1949. 7 U.S.C. §§ 1281-1469 (1988). Plaintiffs are partners in two general part*767nerships that conduct farming operations in Colusa County, California. The partnerships finance their operations through a joint loan obtained from a local bank.
The county, state, and federal Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (ASCS) offices limited plaintiffs’ farm subsidy to $50,000.00 — the maximum payment for a single farmer. Plaintiffs believed that the $50,000.00 payment limitation would…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hanson v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Doty v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Ishida v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Ross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Simons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.