Legal Opinion
Blacker v. Wiethe
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 1968No. 68-165PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.
In support of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is contended that Section 302.13(M), Revised Code, represents a standardless delegation of legislative power, in violation of Section 1 of Article II of the Ohio Constitution.
Section 302.13, Revised Code, reads, so far as pertinent:
*67“Pursuant to and in conformity with the Constitution of Ohio and without limiting the powers and duties otherwise vested in the board of county commissioners, the board may:
U # # *
“(M) By ordinance or resolution make any rule, or act in any matter not specifically prohibited by general law; provided that, in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Belden v. Union Central Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Mansfield v. EndlyOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Associated Builders & Contrs. of Cent. Ohio v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re RETAINING VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE, L.L.P., AS SPECIAL COUNSELOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State Ex Rel. O'Connor v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Okey v. WaltonOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
- City of Cincinnati v. CoatesOhio Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.