Legal Opinion

Blacker v. Wiethe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1968No. 68-165PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

In support of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is contended that Section 302.13(M), Revised Code, represents a standardless delegation of legislative power, in violation of Section 1 of Article II of the Ohio Constitution.

Section 302.13, Revised Code, reads, so far as pertinent:

*67“Pursuant to and in conformity with the Constitution of Ohio and without limiting the powers and duties otherwise vested in the board of county commissioners, the board may:

U # # *

“(M) By ordinance or resolution make any rule, or act in any matter not specifically prohibited by general law; provided that, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Belden v. Union Central Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Mansfield v. EndlyOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Associated Builders & Contrs. of Cent. Ohio v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re RETAINING VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE, L.L.P., AS SPECIAL COUNSELOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State Ex Rel. O'Connor v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Okey v. WaltonOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. City of Cincinnati v. CoatesOhio Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API