City of Cincinnati v. Coates
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentHerbert, J.
There being no hill of exceptions in these cases, the sole and proper question raised by these appeals is the constitutionality, on its face, of Section 901-L6 of the Cincinnati Code of Ordinances. It appears to be well established that the question of the constitutionality of a statute or ordinance is judicially cognizable under these circumstances. Belden v. Union Central Life Ins. Co. (1944), 143 Ohio St. 329, 55 N. E. 2d 629; Blacker v. Wiethe (1968), 16 Ohio St. 2d 65, 242 N. E. 2d 655. Cf. Castle, v. Mason (1915), 91 Ohio St. 296, 110 N. E. 463; State, ex rel. Herbert, v. Ferguson…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.