Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Associated Builders & Contrs. of Cent. Ohio v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2010No. 2008-1478PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

{¶ 1} This appeal concerns the process used by the Franklin County Board of Commissioners to determine that appellant The Painting Company was not the best bidder for a public works contract despite being the lowest bidder. We hold that preemption under R.C. Chapter 4115, the framework providing rights and remedies for private contractors and subcontractors engaged in the construction of public improvements in this state, is not applicable to the policy the board *113established for evaluating bids on public contracts. Therefore, no preemption analysis is required.

{¶ 2} We also hold that a public…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cedar Bay Construction, Inc. v. City of FremontOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. City of Dayton, ex rel. Scandrick v. City of Dayton Mayor McGeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. City of Eastlake v. Ohio Board of Building StandardsOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. J.A. Croson Co. v. J.A. Guy, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. GoodenowOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Ohio Valley Associated Bldrs. & Contrs. v. Rapier Elec., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Intralot, Inc. v. BlairOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Ohio Valley Associated Builders & Contractors v. Industrial Power Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Pruneau v. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Wage & HourOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API