Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re RETAINING VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE, L.L.P., AS SPECIAL COUNSEL

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2011No. 10 MA 167PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeGenaro, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellants, Mahoning County Prosecutor Paul J. Gains, the Mahoning County Prosecutor’s Office, Assistant Mahoning County Prosecutor Gina Bricker, and the Mahoning County Board of Commissioners, appeal.the judgment of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas denying their application to appoint special counsel to represent the Mahoning County Prosecutor’s Office and the board of commissioners in two public-records-request mandamus actions currently pending before the Ohio Supreme Court.

{¶ 2} The primary issue in this appeal is whether, upon joint application of both the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Hubbell v. City of XeniaOhio Supreme Court · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. New Hope Community Church v. Patriot Energy Partners, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Michael P. Harvey Co., L.P.A. v. RavidaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Krueger v. Willowood Care Ctr. of Brunswick, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State ex rel. Hicks v. McBrideOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API