Legal Opinion

City of Mansfield v. Endly

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, J.

This action was begun by the city of Mansfield by virtue of and in accordance with Section 286 of the General Code of Ohio, for the purpose of recovering the sum of $175, previously found by the Bureau of Inspection and Supervision of Public Offices to have been illegally paid by the city to the defendant, Albert B. Endly, as salary for his services as councilman. It is made known that this is a test case, which will be decisive of a similar question existing between the city and some ten or more other councilmen.

The question presented is dependent upon the constitutionality of Section 4209…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Youngstown v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Northern Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of Rocky River v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Blacker v. WietheOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Schultz v. Upper Arlington CityOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Hubbard v. DefianceOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API