Legal Opinion

Allen v. Stellar

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1930No. Docket No. 4099PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This cause is before us upon the plaintiffs’ appeal from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the defendants’ demurrer, wherein the plaintiffs sought specific performance of the following contract:

“Van Nuys, Calif., 7/26/’24
“J. E. Allen:
“When I have procured deed to the West % of Lot 17— Tract 1000 from Richard W. Koehler et ux, I hereby agree to sign contract to you selling you an undivided % interest in the above ten acres, more or less, for the sum of $6250.00 on which you will receive a credit of $1250.00 leaving balance of $5000.00. Said property being acquired subject to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Craig v. ZelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Prince v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. McKevitt v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Joyce v. TomasiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Carr v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Vilardo v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Roberts v. LebrainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Gordon v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. O. A. Graybeal Co. v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API