Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Perkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1930No. Docket No. 3935PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE PLUMMER Delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The respondent had judgment against the appellant for the sum of $2,500 on account of damages alleged to have been suffered by the respondent by reason of the failure of the appellant to convey lands and premises in pursuance of a certain instrument in writing, in words and figures as follows, to wit:

“Madera, California, December 31st, 1924.
“Mr. Virgel Gordon,
“Madera, California.
“Dear Sir:
“In the event that I purchase that certain property described as N. E. ¼ of N. E. ¼ of Section 35/11/17 at the Commissioner’s sale, I agree to assign…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Breckinridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hall v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Eaton v. WilkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Cornett v. ClereCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Allen v. StellarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hanlon v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Dontzin v. MyerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Roberts v. LebrainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Dennis v. OverholtzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API