Legal Opinion

Sprague v. Picher

District Court, D. Maine

Decided April 18, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, District Judge.

A petition has been filed by counsel for the plaintiffs in the above-mentioned suit asking this court to order their counsel fees and expenses, in addition to the taxable costs, to be paid by the defendant, receiver of a national bank.

The action was brought to establish a priority claim on certain bonds in the hands of the receiver. It was found by the court that the plaintiffs, in common with others in the same situation, were entitled to an equitable lien on the bonds; and, as they had been sold and the funds in the hands of the receiver augmented by the proceeds, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Gaines v. RuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. In Re Washington & Georgetown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Ticonic Nat. Bank v. SpragueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
  5. State ex rel. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Sprague v. Ticonic Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  3. Baird v. BellottiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
  4. Sprague v. Ticonic Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1939
  5. Lack v. Western Loan & Building Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API