Legal Opinion

Baird v. Bellotti

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 13, 1982No. Civ. A. 74-4992-APublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge. *

The single matter dealt with in this opinion is defendants’ motion to dismiss for lateness plaintiff-intervenors’ and plaintiffs’ applications for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, filed 8, and 30 months, respectively, after the Supreme Court had denied a petition to rehear its decision affirming this court’s judgment in their favor. Counsels’ services were rendered in litiga lion brought to declare unconstitutional a Massachusetts statute which required a minor to obtain parental, or judicial, consent to an abortion. Original plaintiffs…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. William Baird v. Francis X. Bellotti, Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, William Baird v. Francis X. BellottiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  2. Urban League v. Mayor and CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  3. Indiana Hospital Licensing Council v. Women's Pavilion of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Baird v. BellottiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1984
  5. Sellers v. Local 1598, District Council 88, American Federation of State, County, & Municipal EmployeesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API