Legal Opinion
Sprague v. Ticonic Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 8, 1940No. Nos. 3533, 3534PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Circuit Judge.
This litigation, though not involving much money, has twice been all the way to the Supreme Court. We now have to consider an appeal and a cross-appeal from a decree of the District Court allowing in part and denying in part the plaintiff’s petition for reimbursement of litigation expenses, including counsel fees, referred to as “costs as between solicitor and client.” Throughout this opinion, “plaintiff” refers to Lottie F. Sprague, the original plaintiff, recently deceased, whose executor has been substituted in her stead.
On March 28, 1931, the plaintiff delivered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ticonic National Bank v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ticonic Nat. Bank v. SpragueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
- Sprague v. PicherDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1938
- Sprague v. Ticonic Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Weisburgh v. Fidelity Magellan FundCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Fase v. Seafarers Welfare & Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Fase v. Seafarers Welfare And Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. 110-118 Riverside Tenants CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Godfrey P. Schmidt v. Joseph S. McCarthy and Seymour J. Spelman, John T. Wiley v. Joseph S. McCarthy and Seymour J. SpelmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.