Legal Opinion

Asch v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1989No. 89-225PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, David Asch, seeks review of his motion for credit for jail time which was deemed automatically denied, pursuant to Rule 301, U.R.D.Ct., 1 after the expiration of sixty days without the district court acting on the motion.

We affirm.

Although no briefs have been filed, it is apparent that the only issue that Asch could raise here is the district court’s denial of his motion which was implicitly made pursuant to Rule 36, W.R.Cr.P. Since the facts of this case warrant it, we dispose of this appeal summarily and without briefing. McFarlane v. State, 781 P.2d 931 (Wyo.1989); Peper v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. McFarlane v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Lightly v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Mower v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Peper v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ellett v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hodgins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Duran v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Badura v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Shannon Edward Stevenson v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API