Jones v. State

*369URBIGKIT, Justice.

Appellant Charles Boyd Jones, in two stated issues, presents the propriety of a sentence which effectively gave him a minimum sentence that is longer than his maximum sentence as to whether:

[A] sentencing judge is constitutionally required to give an indigent defendant full credit against both his minimum and maximum sentences for time served in presentence confinement.

[T]he district court erred in concluding that it lacked discretion to credit Appellant’s minimum sentence with the time spent in presentencing incarceration.

The State, as appellee, added a third issue asking…