Legal Opinion

Mower v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1989No. 89-29PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This case came before the court upon the court’s own motion to consider the jurisdiction of the court in this appeal. In the process, it became apparent that the court should consider the application of res judi-cata. The essential question is whether one can appeal from the imposition of a sentence asserting abuse of discretion without raising the lawfulness of the sentence and, following an adverse determination of that appeal, make a claim for relief under Rule 36, W.R.Cr.P., on the ground that the sentence was unlawful.

In Mower v. State, 750 P.2d 679 (Wyo. 1988), Michael Peter Mower, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mower v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Whitney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Wright v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hamill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kupec v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. McFarlane v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Swackhammer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API