Duran v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Chief Justice.
Having signed a plea agreement without reading the document, appellant feels he should be excused from the penitentiary term therein agreed to. That term was the most prominent feature of two judgments and sentences which were not appealed. We affirm the district court’s denial of appellant’s efforts to avoid his plea agreement through the filing of a motion purportedly seeking correction of an illegal sentence.
I. ISSUES
Appellant, Conrad Duran (Duran), failed to articulate his issue(s). We summarize the thrust of his argument:
1. Due to his inattention to the plea…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ryan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Manes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Bush v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Harlow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.