Legal Opinion

Badura v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1992No. 91-268PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Chief Justice.

We review a criminal defendant’s claim that the trial court failed to follow statutorily required procedures in ordering restitution included in his felony sentence following a guilty plea.

Appellant, James Lawrence Badura, Jr. (Badura), contends the trial court failed to comply with governing statutes in imposing restitution as a part of his sentence, in that: if inquiry had been made into his ability to pay, the trial court would then have been compelled to find Badura did not have the means to pay the ordered restitution. He also claims the trial court failed to make…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Duffy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. CooksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kahlsdorf v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Price v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Christensen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mapp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Aldridge v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ramsdell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Dickson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API