Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 23, 1923No. 14278PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, 0.
The plaintiff commenced her action in the district court of Garvin county, in which it was alleged that she was the owner of and in possession of the real estate described in the petition, and prayed that the title ho quieted in plaintiff as against the de fendant. The .defendant answered by way of general denial and cross-action that he was the owner of and entitled to the property through a resale tax deed executed and delivered to him by the county treasurer of Garvin county. A copy of the deed was attached to the answer showing a resale of the land by the county…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conners v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Keller v. HawkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- De Frieze v. QuintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Blanchard v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Charland v. Trustees of the Home for Aged WomenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Smith v. BostaphSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Michie v. HaasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Treese v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Cheney v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Adams v. Heirs of McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.